|
sunflowerbeams (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I agree.
Underdog24601 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
arnt?....ok. I was referring to the FOX debate. I know both parties did the youtube debate. Go snowman!
straygypsy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yeah, but true nontheless.....
Mattatta123 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
fox's owner as a political agenda... however the youtube debate was filled with both parties... so people anrn't ill informed they're just smarter then you
beefnliver (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Anyone who knows anything bout the 3 branches of govt. knows that Congress controls the purse strings. And who is Congress right now? DEMOCRATS!! Yet they dont stop war or spending. Go blame Republicans though; it's all Dems know.
georgiadrew (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
people are stupid, and so the rep. just might get re-elected. they care more about the gays getting married than spending 2.4 trillion on an illegal war
y2knoproblem (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
How come neocon Fox excludes Ron Paul on a consistent basis? Maybe because he is not a neocon?
Underdog24601 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So, the dems were too scarred to show up on FOX? I don't understand. The reps have shown up at the debates on all the liberal news stations, from CNN to NBC. FOX has a high viewership. Why wouldn't they want to get their message out. Let's be honest, the only reason they turned down the FOX debate is because their far left supporters told them to.
OuterHeavenX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If FOX wasnt so far right then maybe they would of showed up.
Underdog24601 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
how come no one puts up videos about how the dems turned down the FOX debate. Some poeple here are ill informed, ignorant, or both. |
